Distillations magazine

Unexpected Stories from Science’s Past
August 7, 2025 People & Politics

Disorderly Persons

What are laws against fortune-telling really meant to do?

Color illustration of a blindfolded flapper holding a crystal ball
About SUPPORT OUR WORK

THE STORE WAS DIMLY LIT, with walls painted a deep purple and the sweet smell of incense in the air. Beck emerged from the back of the shop, introduced themselves, and walked with me to the consultation room for my “Celtic cross reading.”

They sat down in a large wicker chair and shuffled the cards while we chatted about the new shop and the surprisingly robust support from the community following the run-in with the police chief that had put Beck Ravenswood (at the time, Beck Lawrence) on my radar. After a few minutes they asked if there was anything I was particularly interested in talking about. Aren’t we all interested in the same small set of topics: job, relationships, health?

At some point, they laid out the cards on the small table between us. For the next 45 minutes or so they used the cards as signposts in an encouraging and generally optimistic reflection on work and happiness.

Notably absent were any predictions, any specific references to the future. Beck didn’t tell me I would become wealthy or find my soulmate. They didn’t promise a better job waiting for me around some corner. Instead, they talked about how to approach life, how to think about the challenges that inevitably arise, and how, in a general sense, to draw on past experiences when confronting new difficulties. It felt like a cross between an encouraging conversation with a supportive friend and a personalized theater performance.

I left having enjoyed the experience but having learned nothing concrete about what the future held, not even where to find a good meal. Standing in front of the shop, I looked across the central square and spotted Hanover’s own Famous Hot Weiner. At least now I knew where I would have lunch.

Storefront advertising fortune-telling services, such as palm reading.
Storefront in Long Beach, California, 1973.

A couple weeks later I went to my dermatologist for my annual skin check. I pulled into the parking lot of an unremarkable medical building in the Philadelphia suburbs. The waiting room, also generic, was bright, the walls were a nondescript beige, and the air smelled faintly antiseptic. I checked in at the counter, sat in a chair, and, when called, went back to an examination room. After a few minutes the physician walked in, introduced himself, and began the exam.

He started with my head, looking carefully around my scalp. On the side of my head he found a slightly raised spot, a mole. He asked if I had noticed it. I had. He inspected it for a minute and then expressed concern. He wanted to remove it and have it tested. The implication seemed clear: removing the mole reduced the chance it would develop into melanoma. Fifteen minutes and a small patch of skin later, I left. After a few days somebody from the office left a message on my phone: the mole was benign.

I juxtapose my skin exam with my tarot reading to highlight peculiarities in Pennsylvania law. In Pennsylvania and a number of other states across the country, fortune-telling is a misdemeanor. Why, in 2025, do we have statutes on fortune-telling? Why is fortune-telling a crime? And what are those laws actually doing?

Black and white photo of a machine featuring an animatronic old woman
Fortune-telling machine, Salisbury Beach, Massachusetts, 1985.

Although Pennsylvania’s statute covers goods and services that today might seem far-fetched—including love potions and necromancy—at its core is a vague notion of “fortune-telling.” Anyone who “pretends for gain or lucre to tell fortunes or predict future events by cards, tokens, the inspection of the head or hands of any person, or by the age of anyone” has committed a crime. What exactly constitutes fortune-telling is unclear, or rather, perhaps so clear as not to need any clarification.

According to a strict interpretation of the statute, Beck’s Celtic cross reading scarcely qualifies as fortune-telling, a key aspect of which seems to be some sort of prediction. By contrast, my dermatologist’s actions seem criminal. He often makes predictions based on the inspection of a patient’s head or hands: this mole poses no threat, that mole could kill you. The accuracy of his predictions is not at issue. And though “lucre” seems to mischaracterize his motives, he certainly makes his predictions for gain.

We can all agree this conclusion is absurd. My dermatologist is not breaking any law. We all know he is not a fortune teller. The university-trained physician who works in a sterile environment, whose demeanor is calculatedly sterile, and who wears a recognizable uniform is not a fortune teller. Our social expectations and assumptions assure us of such.

Similarly, our social expectations shape our perception of Beck. They dress as they want. They are interested in their clients as people. They ask personal questions and listen carefully to the answers. Their store is softly lit, warm, and has a pleasant smell. They sit in a comfortable wicker chair and shuffle tarot cards. Though they make no predictions, we know Beck is a fortune teller.

Graffiti of annotated palmistry chart
Graffiti in Brussels, 2014.

HANOVER POLICE CHIEF CHAD MARTIN knew Beck was a fortune teller when he walked into the Serpent’s Key in October 2023 to warn them that tarot reading was illegal. The interaction made news around the state and was even covered in the New York Times. It eventually prompted Beck to file a federal lawsuit to strike down the state’s prohibition.

While Pennsylvania’s statute is vague in defining what constitutes fortune-telling beyond a brief reference to “predict[ing] future events,” it is surprisingly specific in its list of prohibited ways of telling fortunes, including cards, tokens, heavenly bodies, spells or charms, incantations, and necromancy. (I appreciate the law’s attention to detail, distinguishing love powders from love potions. I wonder if ointments fall through the proverbial statutory cracks.)

In addition to banning particular techniques, the statute outlaws certain types of services. It is against the law to “pretend to enable anyone” to locate or recover stolen property, find buried treasure, prevent or cause bad luck, injure people, their animals, or businesses, or make somebody fall in love or marry. This hodgepodge of practices and purposes seems to describe the activities of astrologers, tarot readers, phrenologists, palm readers, and psychics, but could also include those of police detectives, treasure hunters on the History Channel, and relationship counsellors.

Tarot card showing fortune and augmentation
Cards, ca. 1872–1890, from the Grand Etteilla, a tarot deck created by French occultist Etteilla (Jean-Baptiste Alliette) in the late 18th century.

Justifications for anti-fortune-telling statutes typically include preventing fraud or protecting gullible clients. People, we are told, turn to fortune tellers when they are emotionally vulnerable and susceptible to being swindled. And it’s easy enough to find examples of fortune tellers, usually claiming to be psychics or spiritual healers, who have taken advantage of such clients.

Some of these swindlers have become well known. Perhaps most famously, in the 1990s “Miss Cleo” was the face of a wide practice of fraudulent “psychic hotlines” that swindled millions from clients via 1-900 toll calls. Others have more local reputations but no less an impact. For more than 15 years, a Cleveland-area psychic scammed her clients out of more than a million dollars in pawned Rolexes and early 401(k) withdrawals. In Florida a number of psychics have taken advantage of clients in recent years, including one in Tampa who bilked an older man of a million dollars, apparently with the help of the man’s much younger (and now former) wife, and a family of psychics in Fort Lauderdale who spent two decades swindling millions from clients, including best-selling author Jude Deveraux.

Such examples confirm our assumption that fortune-telling is inherently fraudulent and fortune tellers are nothing but fraudsters. However, evidence suggests we might jump too quickly to that conclusion. It is hard to get precise numbers, but industry figures indicate around 10,000 people in the United States do business as fortune tellers, broadly understood. Most are sole proprietors who make less than $50,000 per year and have never been accused of misconduct.

Illustrated poster of a blindfolded flapper holding a crystal ball advertising Lady Leona, psychic marvel, girl with a radio mind, she sees all knows all
Circus poster, ca. 1930s.

For comparison, in the United States there are around 11,000 practicing dermatologists. By all indications, most of them have not committed any malpractice either. Some have, however, defrauded both patients and insurance companies of millions of dollars. Florida, again, offers a number of examples: in 2020 the Suncoast dermatology chain agreed to pay $2.3 million for submitting false claims; Treasure Coast Dermatology had to repay $2.5 million in 2018 to settle charges of billing fraud that spanned years; a dermatologist in Tampa was fined $26.1 million to settle a case that included kickbacks and unnecessary surgeries; and another in Sarasota was fined more than $7 million and sentenced to 22 years in prison for fraud, including unnecessary surgeries on 865 elderly patients.

We do not use the examples of fraud and malpractice by dermatologists, and people posing as dermatologists, to justify condemning the profession, and we do not assume all dermatologists are fraudsters. Why do we assume the best of dermatologists and the worst of fortune tellers?

We can begin to answer that question by looking at the emergence of anti-fortune-telling statutes. Pennsylvania’s law, like those in other states, echoes anti-vagrancy and anti-witchcraft statutes dating back to at least the 16th century.

Engraving showing a group of people in 17th-century garb traveling by foot and horseback
Detail from French artist Jacques Callot’s Les bohémiens en marche (The Bohemians Marching: The Vanguard), 1621.

IN 1530 HENRY VIII ISSUED two laws aimed at combatting vagrancy. Vagrants, the crown declared, threatened to defraud citizens and disrupt social order. The first law noted that “many outlandish people calling themselves Egyptians” were roaming England and using “subtle and crafty means to deceive people.” The second law focused on “idle persons” who refused to work and claimed “to have knowledge in physic, physiognomy, palmistry, or other crafty science” and the ability to tell people their “destinies, deceases, and fortunes.”

Already we can see the anxieties that would continue to shape such laws. Vagrants weren’t simply poor, they were the able-bodied, wandering poor who represented some threat to society. They were “Egyptians,” not limited to an ethnic group but rather people who rejected societal norms, led peripatetic lives, didn’t belong to a parish or church, and didn’t work in a legitimate occupation. Often in 16th-century law and literature we see worries that “Egyptians” lingered in society’s criminal fringes, peddling deceit and fraud through “crafty sciences.” Chaucer had used “crafty science” to mean alchemy, but by 1530 it was a broader term that encompassed a wide variety of fortune-telling practices. In addition to physiognomy and palmistry, it also included astrology, necromancy, cartomancy, and other forms of divination.

Old title page with woodcut illustration of three disabled women
Title page from a 1619 book chronicling the arrest and execution of English women Philippa and Margaret Flower. The sisters and their mother, Joan, were accused of witchcraft and the murder of the two young heirs to the earl of Rutland. The women depicted here are Anne Baker, Joan Willimot, and Ellen Greene, also accused of witchcraft and aiding the Flowers.

A decade later Henry passed the first in a series of anti-witchcraft laws that linked vagrancy and fortune-telling to witchcraft, making it a felony to “use, devise, practice, or exercise . . . any invocations, conjurations of Sprites, witchcrafts, enchantments, or sorceries, to the intent to get or find money or treasure, or to waste, consume, or destroy any person in his body members or goods, or to provoke any person to unlawful love.” Later, Elizabeth I issued a law that established a series of punishments for repeat offenders, including fines, imprisonment, and even death.

Funny how the people who make the laws seem to find ways around them. Astrologers and other fortune tellers were familiar figures at Tudor courts. Henry VIII appointed German mathematician and instrument maker Nicholas Kratzer royal astronomer, a position that would have included astrological as well as astronomical duties. John Dee, one of the 16th-century’s most notorious astrologers, diviners, and confidant of angels, had a long and sordid history with the English crown. During Queen Mary’s reign Dee had been arrested for conjuring after taking it upon himself to cast horoscopes for the queen and then-Princess Elizabeth. When Elizabeth ascended the throne, she promoted Dee to royal advisor. Reportedly she relied on him to choose the date for her coronation.

Despite their own predilection for astrologers and fortune tellers, Tudor monarchs issued statutes that emphasize the criminal potential of fortune tellers based on their vagrancy. Vagrants are always deceivers and a threat to social order. Yet vagrant was always an ambiguous category. In the 16th century, rogues, thieves, “Gypsies,” fortune tellers, Irishmen, and even university students caught begging were apprehended as vagrants. (A study of vagrancy cases in the early 1950s in Philadelphia indicates that vagrancy and vagrant remained ill-defined for centuries.)

Engraving showing two sorcerers standing in graveyard with a ghost in a nightgown
John Dee and fellow occultist Edward Kelley raise a spirit. From an 1807 edition of 18th-century astrologer Ebenezer Sibly’s A New and Complete Illustration of the Occult Sciences.

Through the 1600s, revised versions of the laws continued to focus on witchcraft, vagrants, and fortune-telling, until the early 1700s when belief in witchcraft declined. At that point lawmakers focused on two central ideas. First, they identified “Gypsies” as a distinct group of people who tell fortunes. Second, they considered all fortune-telling not a form of witchcraft, but of deception.

Statutes in the 1740s outlawed “all persons pretending to be gypsies, or wandering in the habit or form of Egyptians, . . . or pretending to tell fortunes, or using any subtle craft to deceive.” From there, the language remains largely unchanged in vagrancy acts for more than a century.

When legislatures in the newly formed United States created their anti-fortune-telling laws, they adopted much of their language from earlier English statutes targeting witches and vagrants; these laws, like their British counterparts, increasingly focused on “Gypsies” and other assumed fraudsters.

In 1799 a New Jersey ban identified fortune tellers as “disorderly persons.” By 1861 Pennsylvania had adopted an anti-fortune-telling law, which echoed both the New Jersey statute and English law. These early U.S. statutes consistently identified “Gypsies,” “disorderly persons,” deviants, and others who posed some moral threat. Pennsylvania’s current statute, adopted in 1972, switches out “Gypsy” for a generic “person” who “tells fortunes,” but is otherwise largely the same.

Oil painting of a woman reading the palm of a wealthy young man. At the same time, an accomplice picks the man’s pocket while another wealthy man steals a chicken from the fortune teller’s bag
The Fortune Teller, Bartolomeo Manfredi, ca. 1616–1617.

WOMEN WERE THE PRIMARY TARGET of witchcraft accusations, especially women who did not conform to traditional societal roles. Elderly widows or young women who had not married were particularly susceptible, as were wise women who mixed herbal medicines and offered other healing practices. These women also tended to be poor.

Although much less common, men were not immune to charges of witchcraft. Men accused of witchcraft also failed to conform to the roles assigned to them. And as with women, poverty and idleness could attract accusations.

Moving into the 19th century in the United States, certain types of women attracted accusations of vagrancy and charges of disorderly conduct. In St. Louis, for example, “fallen women” and anyone who came to the city unmarried and pregnant could be singled out, as could women who worked in beer halls. Prostitutes and pimps, brawlers and beggars, troublemakers, jugglers, as well as able-bodied men who lived off the earnings of their wives—all were considered threats to the moral order and therefore attracted charges of vagrancy.

Daguerreotype of two well-dressed young women seated
Spirit mediums Kate and Maggie Fox, 1852; daguerreotype by Thomas Easterly.

Despite the close connections and negative associations between fortune-telling, vagrancy, and disorderly conduct that were cemented during the 19th century, American women from many walks of life increasingly turned to fortune-telling, broadly understood, as both practitioners and clients. The Fox sisters garnered fame and infamy on both sides of the Atlantic for holding public seances and reportedly communicating with spirits, becoming the most well-known mediums of the time and solidifying the link between women and fortune-telling.

In addition to fame, fortune-telling and related activities offered women a way to claim their independence and, ironically, a certain respectability. As early as the 1830s and continuing to the end of the century, newspapers in New York commonly ran advertisements for women fortune tellers. An article in the New York Daily Herald from 1847 decries the “class of vagrants . . . known as fortune tellers” who were now calling themselves “professors of palmistry” or “ladies of science,” and who lived in “splendid apartments.” The author is clearly upset these fortune tellers, many of them women, have “regular hours of business” and make comfortable and in some cases splendid livings. A New-York Tribune article from 1881 describes a widow whose income increased from $6 per week as a washerwoman to $60 as a clairvoyant.

At the same time the link between fortune-telling and “Gypsies” continued to play an important role in marking fortune tellers. P. T. Barnum regularly hired fortune tellers for his American Museum. A masterful marketer, Barnum knew what his audience expected. In dressing his performers, he drew on the visual trope of the fortune teller as an old “Gypsy” woman. That image had been common in paintings, engravings, and prints since the late 16th century.

The links between “Gypsies” and fortune-telling, both real and imagined, continue today. In Romani communities, fortune-telling is a common practice and a consistent source of income. After a 2007 raid of fortune-telling shops in Philadelphia, one fortune teller claimed the city was “discriminating against Gypsies.”

Black and white photo of an older women offering phrenology
Romani fortune teller at a fair in Long Island, New York, 1932.

When San Francisco began regulating fortune-telling in 2003, the city worked with members of the local Romani community to craft legislation that would satisfy them. While San Francisco’s statute still assumes the threat of fraud—requiring a background check, fingerprinting, a photograph, and a public hearing before issuing a permit—the code does recognize fortune-telling as an industry and seeks to “foster a positive business environment for legitimate practitioners.” While well intentioned, the law’s requirements have threatened the livelihood of some Romani practitioners who, for a variety reasons, often lack the government documentation needed to comply. Even in the best case, the connection between “Gypsies” and fortune-telling is fraught.

Today women continue to make up the majority of fortune tellers and, according to the latest Pew research, are twice as likely as men to consult a fortune teller. In other ways fortune-telling continues to appeal to nonmajority people. The Pew study found that lower-income people, and Black, Hispanic, and English-speaking Asian people are all more than twice as likely to consult fortune tellers than are middle- and upper-income and white people. In the United States, LGBTQ+ individuals are about three times more likely to turn to astrology, tarot cards, or fortune tellers than people outside that community.

Although the number of Americans who rely on fortune tellers has declined slightly since the previous study in 2017, their appeal endures—nearly 30% of the people polled by Pew said they had consulted a horoscope, tarot cards, or a fortune teller in the past year. One tarot reader suggested that the continued attraction has less to do with “prognostication than with the need for ritual, the holding of a deliberate space in which to replenish the self.”

Given the demographics of people associated most with fortune-telling, the statutory echoes of earlier anti-witchcraft and anti-vagrancy laws are unsurprising. Both types of laws identify particular groups of people by focusing on a set of common practices. The practices themselves are not the point, but rather how they mark people. Our laws don’t target practices but a type of person.

Older woman reading the palm of a young man while a young woman looks on
Palm reader at a produce market in Paterson, New Jersey, 1994; photograph by Martha Cooper.

WHEN CHIEF MARTIN STOPPED BY the Serpent’s Key to remind Beck that tarot reading was considered fortune-telling and was therefore illegal, he was just the latest law enforcement officer to act preemptively. Local authorities have long rounded up fortune tellers.

In October 1858, the mayor of New York ordered the police to arrest a dozen female fortune tellers and, echoing New Jersey’s 18th-century lawmakers, charge them for being “disorderly persons.” They were assumed to have committed fraud because they were fortune tellers, not because there was evidence they had defrauded people.

Evidence of fraud is rarely needed for police to come in and arrest fortune tellers or close their businesses. We are told these arrests and closures are meant to protect the public. Such was the case with the 2007 raids in Philadelphia, in which the Department of Licenses and Inspections shuttered 16 shops in the city in just three days and expected to close more. In a clear reference to old stereotypes about “Gypsies,” a deputy L&I commissioner claimed that most “are not little old ladies with kerchiefs on their heads” but con artists out to steal fortunes from vulnerable, often grieving people.

In Beck’s case, as with many cases before, it was unclear what fraud Chief Martin thought had been or might be committed at the Serpent’s Key. Like most clients, I expected Beck to read tarot cards and tell me what they saw in them. As they said, it is a type of performance. You get what you pay for.

Black and white photo of six women seated in a jail cell
Los Angeles Daily News photo of Romani women arrested during a “roundup” of fortune tellers ordered by L.A. Chief of Police Arthur Hohmann following a series of reported thefts, January 1940. These women were among a dozen jailed by police.

In truth, the threat Beck seems to pose is less about some ill-defined fraud and more a function of their identity. Like “Gypsies” and witches before them, fortune tellers are “disorderly persons” whose crime is not conforming to society’s expectations. That’s why my dermatologist is not a fortune teller despite trying to divine my future health through the markings on my head and hands. He is not a “disorderly person.” We can tell by his clothing, his demeanor, and his surroundings that his predictions are science, the most orderly of activities. Even when we don’t understand it, or when he gets it wrong, we continue to accept his authority because he looks the part.

Beck and other fortune tellers, by contrast, do not defer solely to science or draw on its trappings, as we can plainly see by their clothes, their manner, and their surroundings. They find inspiration in “crafty sciences” or, as one tarot reader–astrologer told me recently, they look for “unusual or sacred ways of approaching problems that haven’t found satisfactory answers via other modalities.”

Fortune tellers threaten comfortable assumptions about authority and where to look for answers. For those who consider science a form of moral imperative, fortune tellers seem to tempt the gullible with a type of moral corruption. Therefore, we cling to archaic laws to protect us from the disorder they pose.

More from our magazine

Newspaper photo clipping of a woman seated at a table selling book with a sign titled “Gerson Therapy” above
DISTILLATIONS MAGAZINE

Gerson’s Magic Bullet

Why have so many rejected established cancer therapies for juice cocktails and coffee enemas?

Seated woman pouring liquid from a plastic container onto an upturned pot
DISTILLATIONS MAGAZINE

The Ingenious Arctic Cooking Pot

Rediscovering the clever chemistry behind a ceramic tradition that had all but vanished.

Romantic painting of a woman holding French flag on a battlefield with men holding weapons
DISTILLATIONS MAGAZINE

The Trials of Lavoisier

Tracking the Reign of Terror through a revolutionary chemistry journal.

    Republish

    Copy the above HTML to republish this content. We have formatted the material to follow our guidelines, which include our credit requirements. Please review our full list of guidelines for more information. By republishing this content, you agree to our republication requirements.